The aims of this project were to discover what the American public thinks about the performance of state and local courts and identify different levels of confidence in and satisfaction with the courts.
Trust & Confidence Archives - Page 3 of 4 - University of Nebraska Public Policy Center
PytlikZillig, L. M., Tomkins, A. J., Herian, M. N., & Hoppe, R. (2013) PytlikZillig, Trust in government Findings from public budgeting consultations. Manuscript under review.
Trust and Intention to Comply with a Water Allocation Decision: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge and Consistency
Hamm, J. A., PytlikZillig, L. M., Herian, M. N., Tomkins, A. J., Dietrich, H., & Michaels, S. (2013). Trust and intention to comply with a water allocation decision: The moderating roles of knowledge and consistency. Ecology and Society, 18(4), art. 49. Available from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art49/
Tomkins, A. J., Bornstein, B. H., Herian, M. N., Rosenbaum, D. I., & Neeley, E. M.. (2012). An experiment in the law: Studying a technique to reduce failure to appear in court. Court Review, 48, 96-106.
Bornstein, B. H., Tomkins, A. J., Neeley, E. M., Herian, M. N., & Hamm, J. A. (2012). Reducing court’s failure-to-appear rate by written reminders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0026293
Herian, M. N., Shank, N., & Abdel-Monem, T. (2012). Trust in government and support for governmental regulation: The case of electronic medical records. Health Expectations. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00803.x
PytlikZillig, L., Tomkins, A., Herian, M., Hamm, J., & Abdel-Monem, T. (2012). Public input methods impacting confidence in government.Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6, 92-111.
Using Court Date Reminder Postcards to Reduce Courts’ Failure to Appear Rates: A Benefit-Cost Analysis
Rosenbaum, D. I., Hutsell, N., Tomkins, A. J., Bornstein, B. H., Herian, M. N., & Neeley, E. M. (2012). Using court date reminder postcards to reduce courts’ failure to appear rates: A benefit-cost analysis. Judicature, 95, 177-187.
Public Participation, Procedural Fairness and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty
Herian, M. N., Hamm J. A., Tomkins A. J., & Pytlik-Zillig L. M. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Online. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur064
PytlikZillig, L. and Tomkins, A. (2011). Public engagement for informing science and technology policy: What do we know, what do we need to know, and how will we get there? Review of Policy Research, 28(2), 197-217.